Product Code Database
Example Keywords: silk -winter $31
   » » Wiki: Modal Share
Tag Wiki 'Modal Share'.
Tag

A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type. Glossary (Engineering Services – Transportation, City of Vancouver website. Accessed 2009-06-04.) In freight transportation, this may be .

Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized ( and ) and 30% of . These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.


Comparability of data
Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work. Surveys covering entire metropolitan areas are preferred over surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city. the reference years in these lists span over two decades, making comparisons problematic, especially given changing population, new transportation infrastructure and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, among other factors.


Modal split of journeys to work
The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. Note that it is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver, car passengers and motorbikes (especially relevant for Asian cities).


Metropolitan areas with over 1,000,000 inhabitants
2016GCCSAAustralia
Atlanta1%0%3%86%2016UAUSA
2019 Mexico
2006 Greece
2018MUANew Zealand
Austin2%1%3%83%2019 USA
Baltimore3%0%7%84%2016UAUSA
2018 Spain
2005/2011 China
2015 Serbia
2023 Germany
2016 Charting Transport , retrieved 27 October 2017GCCSAAustralia
2022 Belgium
2019 Colombia
2016UAUSA
2015Other (taxi): 4%Romania
2011 Hungary
4%1%8%84%2021 CMACanada
2016UAUSA
2017 Germany
2016UAUSA
2012KOTI,, retrieved 2013-12-31 South Korea
2008/2011 India
1%0%2%92%2016 USA
2%1%4%81%2020UAUSA
Dhaka19%39%29%13%2009 Bangladesh
18%7%15%59%2020 Ireland
3%1%6%87%2021 CMACanada
2021 China
2022 Germany
2016MA, Other: 0.5%Finland
2011 China
2016UAUSA
2016UAUSA
2019UA *67% motorbikeIndonesia
2018 Malaysia
2016UAUSA
2020 UK
2016UAUSA
2018 Spain
2019 Philippines
2016GCCSAAustralia
2%1%4%87%2016UAUSA
2014 Italy
2016 Belarus
2016CMACanada
2008/2011 India
2023 Germany
2011 Japan
2019UAUSA
2010 Japan
8%2%18%72%2016CMACanada
2020ParisiensFrance
2016GCCSAAustralia
2016UAUSA
2016UAUSA
2016UAUSA
2021 Czech Republic
2012UABrazil
2014 Italy
2016UAUSA
2016UAUSA
2016UAUSA
2016UAUSA
2012UAChile
2017UABrazil
2016UAUSA
N/A4%66%23%2014 South Korea
2009/2011 China
2011 Singapore
N/AN/A73%27%2010 Bulgaria
2011 Sweden
2020DeloitteAustralia
2016 Taiwan
2022 Israel
2008/2009 Japan
2021CMACanada
2021CMACanada
2023, (German) Austria
2015[3] , (Polish) retrieved 2016-01-20 Poland
2022UAUSA


Metropolitan areas with over 250,000 inhabitants
2004
2004
2020
2001
2015
2015
2021 Estudio de la Movilidad en la CAPV de 2021
2001
2001
2017
2014
2012
2012
2018
2011
2016
2018
2021
2004
2019
2018
2016
2017
2009–2010
2004
2019
2001
2015
2017
2021
2016
2004
2004
2018
2004
2016
2016
2017
2013
2011
2020
2004
2018
2004
2001
2023
2022
2001
2013
2019
2016
2004
2014
2017
2020
2021
2004
2018
2004
2004
2004
2011 Naujų transporto rūšių diegimo Vilniaus mieste specialusis planas , retrieved 2013-07-03
2021 Estudio de la Movilidad en la CAPV de 2021
2018
Victoria (CMA)10%7%11%70%2016
2016
2018
2017
2015
Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit Urban Audit , retrieved 2009-10-03


Modal share targets
The Charter of Brussels, signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timișoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise. Charter of Brussels , retrieved 2009-10-03 The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure.

The Canadian city of Hamilton adopted a similar modal share target plan in 2005.


Modal share in the developing world
The modal share differs considerably depending on each city in the developing world.

According to UNECE, the global on-road vehicle fleet is to double by 2050 (from 1,2 billion to 2,5 billion, see introduction), with most future car purchases taking place in developing countries. Some experts even mention that the number of vehicles in developing countries will increase by 4 or 5-fold by 2050 (compared to current car use levels), and that the majority of these will be .


Legislation impacting the modal share
Legislation can discourage car ownership through, for example, taxation and conditions on ). This could help in achieving a modal shift.


See also
  • Air travel demand reduction
  • Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles
  • Intermodal passenger transport
  • Mobility transition
  • (the decisions that determine Modal share, especially in traffic analysis and forecasting)
  • Mode of transport
  • Rail usage statistics by country
  • Road reallocation
  • Environmental aspects of the electric car


Notes

External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs